dealcanvey
12:30 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Would take Walcott. We lack the pace and he can finish aswell.
12 mill extra really is not much at all in todays world. Revenue from tickets is way behind TV rights.
|
Northern Sold
12:10 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Johnson 11:24 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
The stadium makes us about £12m extra per season
So basically Andy Carroll's wages and a bit of change...
|
Northern Sold
12:09 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
I said last season we should have gone all out for Walcott and Benteke... that should have been our next level up teh rung... instead all the Cesspit loving divs like D3 Gavvy and Co all believed Fat Tits Brady and her quote of... * clears throat * .... "Any player in the world you love to play at the Olympic Stadium because its BRILLIANT".. and thought that players like Walcott and Benteke were BELOW us and that we should have gone for Diego fuckin' maradona when he played for Argies in his prime... fucking divs
|
Northern Sold
12:03 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Said we should have gone all out to get him last year... not sure he's a Moysleyely type of player but he's certainly someone I think could do a superb job for us...
|
Johnson
11:24 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
The stadium makes us about £12m extra per season according to that goblin Sullivan.
He could well be lying of course, which makes their lack of spending even worse.
Accounts out soon aren't they?
|
The Ghost of Braderz
10:51 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Lee Trundle 10:10 Tue Dec 5
I think Ayew, Antonio, Sakho and Hernández all currently have a case for starting at the moment, so I'd hardly call not signing Theo Walcott neglect.
|
greenie1
10:49 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Anyone is better than the squad we already have.
|
goose
10:32 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
two questions:
a) is he available on loan?
b) can he protect the back four?
|
Sir Alf
10:30 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Exactly what we don't need. We want physical, fit, hard working,team players.
|
dicksie3
10:27 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
"... thanks to our shiny new stadium that was going to make us MILLIONS and MILLIONS in extra revenue."
It does. And MERCHANDISE REVENUE has also increased massively. The WORLD FOOTBALL REVENUE TABLE also highlights this as we've jumped-up a few places to 15th or whatever.
It's just that our board doesn't want to spend that extra money. Although they clearly pay brain-dead lucrative wages to average wanker players.So that must waste a lot of dosh.
|
Willtell
10:20 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
oooo! A right wing striker and we only have two of those already....
A big burly defender that knows how to man mark would be my first choice...
|
One McAvennieeeeee
10:15 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
The board reckon we have the best squad we've had for years. I wouldn't be too hopeful of many coming in.
|
Lee Trundle
10:10 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
We need to strengthen pretty much every position, IMO. Yes there are other priorities, but that doesn't mean we need to neglect everywhere else.
|
Danbury Hammer
10:10 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Can he play in defence?
|
The Ghost of Braderz
9:42 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
We don't need strengthening up front just yet. There are other priorities. A squad, is like an omelette, you need good eggs, and the right amount of milk, cheese, ham, and tomato. You can't just keep putting more and more cheese in it, just because it's good cheese. Nobody wants a cheesy omelette.
|
Johnson
9:40 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
dicksie - I think you'll find it was the daydreaming divs who claimed we should be looking much higher than the likes of Walcott thanks to our shiny new stadium that was going to make us MILLIONS and MILLIONS in extra revenue.
How did that work out for you all?
|
Rossal
9:36 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
No thanks
Not in form
Overated
Huge wages
Go and get a youngster or someone tearing up the championship like Antonio who will have something to prove
|
Vexed
9:36 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
I'd rather we signed some cunt that can defend.
|
TWe
9:32 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
Would have him and Wilshire.
|
DOUBLE COBBS BOB
9:01 Tue Dec 5
Re: Theo Walcott
|
in the words of 2 Unlimited no no, no no no no, no no no no
]
|
| 
